DSpace Repository

Energy integration of multiple-effect evaporator, thermo-vapor compressor, and background process

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author SHARAN, P
dc.contributor.author BANDYOPADHYAY, S
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-28T17:54:23Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-28T17:54:23Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,164,1192-1204 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0959-6526
dc.identifier.issn 1879-1786
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.041
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/19281
dc.description.abstract Multiple-effect evaporators are commonly used in various industries such as food process, desalination, pulp and paper, etc. for increasing the liquor concentration. Multiple-effect evaporator is an energy intensive equipment. It is often integrated with various energy saving techniques for minimizing the energy consumption. A common technique is integration of multiple-effect evaporator with thermovapor compressor. In thermo-vapor compressor the low-pressure vapor produced in multiple-effect evaporator is compressed with the help of the high-pressure motive steam to produce an intermediate-pressure vapor, which in turn acts as a heat source for the multiple-effect evaporator. The optimal location of vapor suction position for thermo-vapor compressor can significantly affect the energy consumption of integrated multiple-effect evaporator and thermo-vapor compressor system. The other way of reducing the energy consumption is by integrating multiple-effect evaporator with the background process. The present work focuses on the development of a methodology to minimize the overall energy consumption by thermally integrating multiple-effect evaporator, thermo-vapor compressor, and the background process. A theorem for optimal location of vapor suction position for thermo-vapor compressor is proposed. Two examples are considered in this study for demonstrating the proposed methodology. An economic analysis is also carried out for calculating the cost benefit for the overall integration. Overall integration leads to 28% of energy saving and 22% reduction in annual cost for corn glucose example compared to standalone system. Similarly, for desalination example, 44% energy and 20% annual cost savings are observed. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. en_US
dc.language.iso English en_US
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD en_US
dc.subject Desalination Processes
dc.subject Seawater Desalination
dc.subject Desalting System
dc.subject Design
dc.subject Optimization
dc.subject Performance
dc.subject Selection
dc.subject Single
dc.subject Plants
dc.subject Cycle
dc.subject.other Multiple-Effect Evaporator
dc.subject.other Thermo-Vapor Compressor
dc.subject.other Background Process
dc.subject.other Grand Composite Curve
dc.subject.other Process Integration
dc.subject.other Desalination
dc.title Energy integration of multiple-effect evaporator, thermo-vapor compressor, and background process en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account