| dc.contributor.author |
JAAFARNIA M. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
SHENDE A. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
BOROOMAND S. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2023-03-17T06:20:50Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2023-03-17T06:20:50Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
Sustainable Production and Consumption,271349-1356 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn |
23525509 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.012 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/100/43721 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
3d printer manufacturers have been focussing on maintaining their market position considering the ever-changing demands for new product designs. The recent boom in the household 3d-printer market raises the question of whether it is a good idea to produce large numbers of household 3d-printers, considering that the satisfaction with the visuals printed by 3d-printers will not remain stable. Changing desires leads prosumers to revise their printed forms, frequently making another design to overcome dissatisfaction. Quick disposal of these successive printed forms creates a significant amount of waste. It was hypothesised that it is not possible to meet the sustainable waste management goals with the increase in household-level 3d-printers. Therefore, the use of 3d-printers is likely to be unsustainable because of this expected substantial increase in waste. This study conducted a literature review to provide a perspective on this phenomenon. The novel contribution of this perspective will help estimate the amount of waste generated. It was concluded that 3d-printers, although help in meeting the everyday desires of prosumers, do not meet the requirements of a sustainable society. © 2021 institution of chemical engineers |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
English |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Elsevier B.V. |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
ERRATIC DESIRES |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
HOUSEHOLD 3D PRINTER WASTE |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
PROSUMER |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Commerce |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Decision making |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Printing presses |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Waste disposal |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Household level |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Literature reviews |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Market position |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
New product design |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Printer manufacturers |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Re-design decision |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Sustainable society |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Sustainable waste management |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
3D printers |
en_US |
| dc.title |
The Redesign Decision-Making Cycle: A perspective on predicting prosumer household 3D printer waste |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Short Survey |
en_US |