| dc.contributor.author |
RAO G.S. |
|
| dc.contributor.author |
RADHAKRISHNA M. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2023-03-17T04:44:37Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2023-03-17T04:44:37Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2021 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
Tectonics,40(2) |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn |
2787407 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
https://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2019TC005804 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/100/38471 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
We present here the results of a seismically well-constrained potential field modeling along with process-oriented gravity modeling across the eastern continental margin of india (ecmi) and its conjugate east antarctica continental margin (eacm). The study revealed both along-strike variations in crustal architecture and effective elastic thickness (te), showing a locally asymmetric pattern. Crustal stretching factors (β) estimated at these margins range between 1.5 and 4.0 with slightly lower values varying over the narrow zone in the cauvery basin-western enderby basin and relatively higher values in other margin segments. The models reveal typical magma-poor margin characteristics in the krishna-godavari (k-g) and cauvery basin segments of ecmi. The ocean-continent transition (oct) in the k-g basin and its conjugate (central enderby basin) indicates asymmetric rifting marked by the development of a detachment fault separating the combined india-elan bank margin and the eacm. The higher β values and magmatic underplating at oct in the mahanadi basin segment of ecmi may be related to the post-breakup magmatic emplacement associated with the proximal activity of the kerguelen plume after the separation of elan bank from india by a ridge jump during m2/m0 (124–120 ma). The pre-rift reconstruction model through the palinspastic restoration of margins suggests that the central part of ecmi (16–20°) is the ideal pre-rift location for the elan bank. © 2021. American geophysical union. All rights reserved. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
English |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
CONJUGATE MARGIN |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
EAST ANTARCTICA |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
INDIA |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
PALINSPASTIC RECONSTRUCTION |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
POTENTIAL FIELD MODELING |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
PROCESS-ORIENTED GRAVITY MODELING |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Geophysics |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Tectonics |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Asymmetric patterns |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Continental margin |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Crustal stretching |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Detachment fault |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Effective elastic thickness |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Potential field |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Potential field modeling |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Process-oriented |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Bank protection |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
continental breakup |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
continental margin |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
crustal structure |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
emplacement |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
gravity field |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
ocean-continent transition |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
plate convergence |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
plate tectonics |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
potential field |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
rifting |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
tectonic reconstruction |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Antarctica |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
Cauvery Basin |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
East Antarctica |
en_US |
| dc.subject.other |
India |
en_US |
| dc.title |
India-Elan Bank-East Antarctica Breakup, Crustal Architecture, and Margin Evolution: Results From Constrained Potential Field and Process-Oriented Gravity Modeling of Conjugate Margin Segments |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |